Mark Leach is an attorney with a Master's in Bioethics, focusing on health law and public contracts. His interest in bioethics concerns the issues surrounding prenatal testing and Down syndrome.

Is Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening the “Holy Grail” of Prenatal Testing?

In her recent blog post at the Huffington Post, Dr. Anne Drapkin Lyerly, a doctor who chaired ACOG's ethics committee, says she has found the "Holy Grail" of prenatal testing in Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS). Is she correct? Continue Reading

Enjoying the small things: from the diagnosis to now 3 years old by Kelle Hampton

Three years ago, Kelle Hampton burst onto the scene with a telling of how her daughter's diagnosis of Down syndrome was delivered. In a recent post, she shares how her daughter's doing now and what they've learned. Continue Reading

What does Ashton Kutcher’s Teen Choice Remarks have to do with Down syndrome prenatal testing?

  Ashton Kutcher's remarks upon winning the "Ultimate Choice" award are receiving a lot of coverage, and not just because he revealed that his real name, his first name, is Chris. But what do they have to do with prenatal testing and Down syndrome? Continue Reading

Adam Wolfberg’s research says don’t offer new testing for Down syndrome to all moms

Actually, Adam Wolfberg recently said just the opposite. But, Wolfberg’s own research doesn’t support his recommendation.  Continue Reading

“We never thought for a moment we would aid in the eradication of Down syndrome”

NBC News's Health blog featured a long post on the new research that "turns off" the extra 21st Chromosome in Down syndrome. There are many things to learn from it.  Continue Reading

Down syndrome birth statistics, so far

Over at Down Syndrome Affiliates in Action (DSAIA), my report on birth statistics has been posted. It explains the above graph showing an overall decline in Down syndrome births in 2013, so far. Continue Reading

Holiday

I am on a week-long vacation with intermittent internet access. Posting, therefore, will be light. However, I have added a "News" page, available at this link. I invite you to visit the links there and please share any news items with me at mleach[at]downsyndromeprenataltesting[dot]com. Continue Reading

“Not exactly a great scientific achievement”: prenatal testing in low risk populations

Yesterday's post generated a lot of discussion on Facebook and off-line about the role of maternal age and the incidence of Down syndrome. Today, we consider the value of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in relation to the mother's age. Continue Reading

Maternal age, the chance for Down syndrome, and prenatal testing

In 2007, the medical guidelines changed from only offering women 35 years old and older prenatal testing for Down syndrome to offering it to all expectant mothers. This, however, should not mean maternal age is irrelevant when considering prenatal testing. And, it turns out, something commonly reported about maternal age is incorrect. Continue Reading